Gold: an alternative to “safe” dollar assets?
By James Luke, Fund Manager, Metals at Schroders
Gold's long-term fundamentals were already looking positive. By effectively rejecting the US role as reserve currency issuer, President Trump is super-charging these trends.
We have held for some time the view that long-run global geopolitical and fiscal trends have the potential to drive a very powerful bull market in gold.
Geopolitically, the world has been moving from a globalising “Washington consensus” towards multi-polarity and great power rivalry for some time. Fiscally, very high sovereign debt and long-run untenable domestic deficits (in the US, in parts of Europe and in China) are a potent cocktail that history tells us usually ends in currency debasement, inflation and fiscal dominance.
These trends already held the potential to create a situation where multiple pockets of global capital attempt to acquire gold, as a “safe” monetary metal, simultaneously. As we have often repeated, the gold market is simply not large enough to absorb such a simultaneous global bid without much higher prices. President Trump is accelerating and super-charging the potential for that simultaneous global bid.
Trump: Cyclically stagflationary, structurally seismic
Trump’s protectionist agenda is cyclically stagflationary as a base case.
The Schroders Economics Team places the impact of “Liberation Day” tariffs on US inflation at 2% with a hit to growth of almost 1%, before accounting for any retaliatory tariffs. As charts 1 and 2 below demonstrate, stagflation can be painful for risk assets but tends to be very supportive for gold.
The bigger picture is potentially much more seismic. By proposing heavy tariffs based on the size of deficits (not actual trade barriers) Trump is making it clear that the US wants not free trade but balanced trade. This rejection of deficits is the starkest rejection yet of globalisation but also can be seen as a de-facto rejection of the US dollar-centric global monetary regime that the global economy has lived under since the end of Bretton Woods in 1971.
Since then, the US dollar has acted as the primary global reserve currency, dominating official reserves and dominating international trade and finance, far beyond US share of global GDP. It has underpinned an open and rules based global trading system, complemented by steadfast geopolitical alliances.
One of the largest effects of this dollar standard status quo has been the recycling of dollar revenue into US dollar assets, mainly Treasuries, which are seen as “safe” assets and the bedrock of the global financial system. Foreign holdings of US equity and private credit assets are also enormous. This cumulative flow now leaves the US with a net international investment position of a negative US$26 trillion, as Trump himself quoted in his 2 April address.
It does not take a Nobel Prize in economics to work out that the current tariff-based assault on the global trading system might, in turn, lead to significant repatriation flows amid a questioning of just how “safe” dollar assets now are or how bright the relative US economic outlook is. With such a dearth of credible alternatives, expecting gold to be a major beneficiary of such a repatriation trend is common sense to us.
How high could gold go?
Since finally “breaking out” in early 2024, gold prices have rallied by over US$1,000/Oz. Gold has had a particularly good run recently through Q1 2025, with prices reaching $3,150/oz in early April.
This brief note is not the place for a detailed dive into gold supply and demand but it is worth stating again that in a scenario where already strong central bank demand is joined by strong global investment demand, gold prices could easily move much higher to generate the increase in recycled supply and destruction of jewellery demand necessary to balance the market. Mine supply cannot respond quickly even at much higher prices. Despite already record high prices, mine supply is basically flat on 2018 levels.
Gold at $5,000/oz by the end of the decade did not feel an outlandish scenario twelve months ago. It feels frankly conservative now.
What does this mean for gold equities?
For gold equities, we think current prices are very likely to translate into the largest growth in earnings and free cash flow of any sector in the broad equity market.
Despite this, investors have on aggregate responded by selling passive exposure to the gold equity sector at the fastest rate we can see on record. In 1Q 2025 alone US$2.4 billion has been liquidated from passive products. To us, this is astonishing, and very bullish from a sentiment perspective.
No other major commodity is anywhere near its all-time real high, let alone above it. This is because gold is rallying as a monetary asset, not as a commodity asset. The rest of the commodity complex (for example, diesel, steel, fossil fuel derived consumables) is a big driver of gold producers’ operating and capital costs. Cost inflation from these areas, and from labour, is far more limited than in 2021/22. With gold prices at record highs, this translates into record profit margins for gold producers.
